Roboflow vs LendAPI vs Arbol
Three FDE postings from this week, three completely different jobs under one title: a vision-AI platform, a lending-infrastructure startup and a climate-risk insurer.
| Roboflow | LendAPI | Arbol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open roles | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Comp on board | $180K–$250K base + equity (per recruiter post; not shown on Ashby page) | $140K–$180K base + 0.10–0.20% equity | Undisclosed |
| FDE type | Solutions engineering | True forward-deployed | Product-embedded |
| Travel | Medium | Low | Remote-first |
| Comp | Top of market | Equity-heavy | Below market |
| Stage | Growth-stage | Early-stage | Growth-stage |
| Our take | A top-of-market non-lab FDE band on a seat that sits in GTM — great if the field work feeds product, a quota-carrying SE with a nicer title if it doesn't. | Rare disclosed equity for an FDE, at an early-stage lending platform — but the founder's tweet and the careers page disagree on base pay by $60K, so verify before you apply. | A rare FDE seat inside a climate-risk insurer — you build pricing and decision engines, so it is closer to internal data engineering than customer-facing deployment. |
Bottom line
Roboflow pays the most on paper but sits in GTM, so confirm it isn't quota-carrying. LendAPI is the purest implementation seat and the only one with disclosed equity, but check the conflicting base pay. Arbol is the lowest-paid and most internal, best for a quant who wants remote and domain depth. Pick by what you want to build, not by the title.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.